About your Search

20130504
20130512
Search Results 0 to 1 of about 2
and a possible death penalty. harris faulkner's live from our new york city newsroom with a look back at how this all up folded. >> reporter: you know, going back really puts a fine point on why this case has captivated so many people, the details were just unreal for us to even imagine. first, the romance. jodi arias was an aspiring sales woman and photographer living in california. travis alexander was a salesman and motivational speaker live anything mesa, a suburb of phoenix, arizona. they met in september of 2006 at a work convention in las vegas. they quickly began a long distance relationship. by november of that year, jodi converted to travis' religion and became baptized as a mormon. but things were bumpy, so much so the couple split up in june of 2007. but as we learned in the days and days of raw trial testimony from arias, they continued to see each other in 2007 for sex. weeks later jodi moved to arizona to wait tables and clean travis' house for extra cash. then a few months later she moved back to california in early 2008, and it was if may of that year -- in may of that year
ordered those changes. we will look at the political fallout of all this next. plus, prince harry continuing his visit in our nation's capitol paying his respects to the fallen heroes at arlington national cemetery. more on the royal trip coming up. ♪ [playing of taps ] jon: right now new reporting reveals there where are 12 difference versions of the official administration talking points on the benghazi terror attacks, revisions. the report from abc newsletters says the state department played a big role in the changes that were made, including dropped references to terrorism. of course it was a terror attack last september 11th that took the lives of four americans, including our ambassador. paul gentleman go is editorial page editor at the "wall street journal." so, victoria newland at the state department obviously had a significant role in changing the original talking points, shortening them and saying essentially, why do we want to give ammunition to congress in referring to terrorism here? >> that's very clear from the emails that that is the case. and i think this is i
Search Results 0 to 1 of about 2

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)